![]() ![]() He said they had 90 days to do so, which falls on Monday. In an open memo this summer, he asserted lawmakers could ignore the deadline set by state-level justices and move on to the federal court because the case is a matter of federal interest. "The Ohio General Assembly exercised its authority when it helped develop the constitutional amendment that changed mapping processes and gave the Ohio Supreme Court the authority to strike down district maps."Ĭupp, a former Ohio Supreme Court justice, has advanced the legal theory behind the appeal. “This is more hypocrisy and theater from the leaders of the Ohio General Assembly, because this fringe legal theory they're quoting doesn't even apply in this scenario,” said Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio. The head of one of the groups that brought suit against the maps criticized the appeal. "While many believe that the Ohio Supreme Court majority misinterpreted state law, there is also the broader concern that the Court assumed a role the federal constitution does not permit it to exercise,” they said. Supreme Court asserts the ruling encroached on their legislative authority “in multiple ways.” In a statement, the GOP lawmakers called the high court's July 17 decision rejecting a second proposed congressional map as gerrymandered to GOP partisan advantage “fundamentally flawed.” Their petition to the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |